Category: General Musings

Books Full Of Words

For some reason, who really knows why, I’ve been thinking about dictionaries a lot lately. Specifically, I’ve been wondering if anybody actually buys dictionaries anymore.

Clearly, the answer to that must be yes. Dictionaries are still published and still stocked in bookstores. Sales must be strong enough, or at least steady enough, to cling to a niche of the ink-and-paper-brick-and-mortar bookselling industry. But just as clearly, sales of dictionaries aren’t what they used to be.

Without doing anything that might actually constitute real research, I did a little poking around the Internet and came up with a lot of different answers. Depending on which articles I trusted and how I interpreted them, the bottom line seemed to be that dictionary sales have certainly declined, though perhaps not as much as you might expect. A drop of ten to fifteen percent was cited by more than one source, which sounds bad until you consider how much worse it could be in this day and age of Dictionary.com and Merriam-Webster Online and dozens of other free, keyboard-accessible dictionaries, including my own online favorite, The Free Dictionary. And let’s not even talk about the true evil in our midst, that bane of an educated, literate society — built-in spellcheck functions, which millions of people consider a reliable tool but which help only about a third of the time, the other two-thirds leading to silly, needless, confusing, embarrassing mistakes. As a matter of fact, the only thing worse than built-in spellcheck is built-in grammar checking, which … well, I can’t even tell you what I really think of that, except that I’d like to find the person who invented it, strap him in a chair, and feed him ground up pages of The Elements of Style until he admitted his wickedness.

It seems inevitable that real printed dictionaries will vanish some day, just as it now seems likely that the entire concept of books printed on paper and bound between covers will also eventually disappear, fading into the mists of history and existing only on the shadowy shelves of seldom-visited museum-libraries. I doubt we’ll reach that place in our lifetimes, but we’ve certainly started down the long path that will take our children’s children there. In the meantime, I’m happy that dictionaries and other “old-fashioned” reference books are still with us.

When I was a kid (or what I often call a “little, little kid,” meaning somewhere under the age of twelve or so), I used to love reading the dictionary. Encyclopedias, too. I was blessed to grow up in a family that had no shortage of either. In fact, we had two complete sets of encyclopedias, a Britannica and a Compton’s. I would sit for hours in the room my parents called the den, grazing random encyclopedia articles, browsing the dictionary from letter to letter, dog-earing the pages that had cool words on them. That might explain my knack for winning classroom spelling bees, but come to think of it, it probably also explains my propensity for awkward, run-on sentences and my talent for blurting out random, useless facts at the drop of a hat. If I hadn’t had the opportunity to cozy up to reference books as a kid, I’d probably be a less obnoxious person — but I would almost surely be a poorer one, as well.

If I had grown up thirty or thirty-five years later, it’s doubtful I would have spent hours online at The Free Dictionary, stuffing my head with letters and words. Although I did learn something neat there just this morning (their homepage “Article of the Day” on tesselations), it’s just not the same.

I don’t often have morals in the things I write, but today I find, much to my surprise, that I actually do. Here it is: If you’ve got a kid, particularly one under the age of twelve, buy him or her a dictionary, a real one, an honest to God, genuine book full of words, preferably one with hard covers. You’ll get a strange look, as if you’d just presented a box of socks and underwear on Christmas morning, and the volume will probably spend a fair amount of time tossed in the corner or lost under the bed. But you never know. Someday you might be cleaning their room and find the book and pick it up and discover a handful of highlighted words, underlined definitions or dogeared pages.

Wouldn’t that be a great feeling?

Here’s To The Journey

Not much, thanks. What’s new with you?

Seriously, what can you say after an absence of eleven long months?

There were times during that span I thought I must have had some kind of premonition, that I’d had a little precognitive flash when I put up my post of February 22, 2008, the one explaining the ins and outs of my day job and why it might occasionally keep me away from the blog. Did I know something when I wrote that piece? Had I sensed that I was about to disappear for nearly a year?

Not really, no.

On the other hand, the post did become a convenient excuse, at least during the first few months. When I was being pulled in other directions and starting to feel guilty about neglecting this site, I always had that post to fall back on.

Inner Voice: You really should post something new one of these days.

Other Inner Voice: Don’t worry. You can get to it later. You’ve got time. Remember, you warned them how busy you are and that you might vanish for extended periods. Relax.

After a while, of course, so much time had gone by that even my last post wasn’t enough. A bigger, more thorough, more honest explanation was required. But by then I was in No Man’s Land, a mysterious territory that so many errant bloggers know so well, wanting to get back to it but unsure how to proceed, knowing I would have to come up with a decent cover story but not capable of doing it. Ask anyone who has maintained a Web site for a while but wandered from the path: the longer you stay away, the harder it is to return. The longer you avoid it, the easier it is to keep avoiding it.

There comes a day, however, that the lure of the blog, the siren song of the site, overpowers everything else and you just have to get back to it. And here I am.

Do I have a story, something to explain where I’ve been? Oh, yeah, you bet I do, and believe me, that post from eleven months back only touches the surface. It’s been a year of trauma and drama, tempest and turmoil, most of it far away from the day job. It’s been a year of accidents and illness for those closest to me. It’s been a year of being pushed and pulled in different directions and head-spinning changes and uncertainty and fear and doubt and … well, upheaval.

But I’m not yet ready to tell that story, at least not right here, right now, all in one big chunk. Bits of pieces of it will no doubt spill out over time, and clever readers will surely be able to stitch those fragments together into a workable narrative. So for those of you who are truly curious, I guess you’ve got that to look forward to.

For the rest of you, let’s just wipe the slate and make a clean start, forget the last eleven months and focus on what’s ahead. I’m here. I’m ready to go. I’m happy you’re here, too. And I’m excited about getting back to regular communication with you, to maintaining these pages, to doing all of this cyberspacey kind of stuff, which is really more fun than most folks should be allowed to have.

Here’s to the journey … and let’s get started.икони

Coming (Back) Soon

Just a quick note to let you know that I will be returning to regular duty here very soon. I know, I know. It’s been too long. Way too long. Way, way too long. Way, way, way … well, you get the idea.

Stand by. Posting should resume shortly.

About That Day Job

Regular readers have probably noticed that I never talk much about my day job as editor of our little weekly newspaper. But I do get asked about it from time to time, and since the gig is often responsible for my absences here, I probably owe at least a little explanation of just what it is I’m doing when I disappear.

For starters, as anyone who has ever worked in small-town journalism will tell you, the title “editor” is somethat misleading. Scratch that. Very misleading. The editor of a weekly like ours doesn’t sit behind a desk and dish out assignments to a staff of reporters, send photographers out to get the important shots, and buff up rough copy until it turns into glittering journalistic gems. Sometimes a weekly will have several reporters on staff, but just as often the editor is it. That’s certainly the case where I work, where I am the entire news staff. I report and write the stories. I shoot the pictures. I type, proofread, copyedit and rewrite all the press releases, letters, announcements and so forth that pour into the office. I also lay out the paper (which, believe it or not, we still do by cut-and-paste), and do a few other things to boot. Except for the ads, which I’m not involved with, about ninety to ninety-five percent of everything in the paper each week originates with me, is typed by me, edited or rewritten by me, or had some other type of direct involvement from me.

As you can probably guess, all of that usually takes a fair amount of time. There are many long days, many nights spent covering local government meetings, many weekends, many holidays, and always, always, always the deadline. It’s not your usual creative writer’s kind of deadline, either — you know, where you’re late with the book and call your editor to beg for an extra two weeks, or running behind on the story so it gets bumped back to the next issue of the magazine. This is a deadline that is unmoving, unchanging and absolutely unforgiving. You get the paper out every Wednesday no matter what else is going on in town, in the world, or in your own life. I’ve gone without sleep for two days to get out the paper. I’ve skipped trips to get out the paper. I’ve turned down enticing invitations to get out the paper. I’ve missed family activities and milestones to get out the paper. I’ve written when there were no words left to get out the paper. Once, many years ago now, I even showed up on Wednesday with pneumonia and a fever of 104 to get out the paper.

And here may be the real reason I haven’t written much about my day job, because just talking about it can sound an awful lot like whining. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not opposed to whining about my work — I’ve been known to whine about it quite a bit, as a matter of fact — but I usually try not to do it in public.

So, no, I’m not whining. Really. I’m just kind of laying it out, warts and all, for those who are curious.

I don’t always like my day job. Sometimes, truth be told, I really sort of hate it. There are days (or weeks, or months) that I feel myself teetering along a fraying tightrope stretched above a yawning canyon of total burnout. But there are times I actually do kind of like it. It’s never boring, and that’s a big plus. No matter how much of it is exactly the same week after week, there is always plenty that’s new and interesting, too. I’m proud to be part of an important industry and represent a noble species like the weekly small-town newspaper. I’m proud that our particular paper has been publishing for over 130 years; its pretty humbling to be part of a long, unbroken tradition like that. I’m delighted that we’re still independently owned and that we continue to fight the good fight against all the odds: a readership that is quickly aging and vanishing away, an alarmingly dwindling advertising base, an onslaught of competition from dozens of other sources, an onslaught so intense and unrelenting that even the biggest of the big city dailies are at serious risk, to say nothing of the little hole-in-the-wall rags like ours. Whenever I need a little inspiration to finish an impossible article, a little strength to keep typing, a little extra motivation to get out of bed at 3:30 a.m. Wednesday or pull myself together on Monday and start the whole weekly marathon over again … well, then, those things are usually enough to do it.

And that’s the long and short of it. Mostly long, I guess, longer than I thought it would be. But now you know. And you know that the next time I vanish from here for a few weeks at a time, I haven’t gone away for good. I’ll be back just as soon as the news allows.

Happy Birthday, Dear Blog

I almost forgot to mention that today, February 17, marks this blog’s first birthday. It was one year ago today that I unveiled this site to the world and put up the first several posts.

So, happy birthday to … me, I guess!

And more important, thanks to all of you for hanging around and putting up with my (somewhat too sporadic) outpouring of miscellany and disorder. I hope you found the first year interesting and occasionally worthwhile. It’s been a fun journey so far, and I’m very glad to have you by my side.

Winter

Winter continues, long, tough, but beautiful.

My wife took these pictures of our house today, in the midst of our latest “snow event,” which they say could leave ten or twelve inches of new white stuff before it’s finished.

House 1

House 2

When Books Are Like The Movies

I’m no different than you. When I go to the movies, I don’t like to sit through thirty minutes of coming attractions before getting to the film I actually came to see. It’s the same with DVDs, where one or two trailers are kind of fun but eight or ten are just plain annoying. Still, I do like trailers as a genre, in the same way I really enjoy a well-crafted television commercial. They’re art forms all their own. When done right, they can be easily as entertaining (if not as fulfilling) as longer works.

I also enjoy trailers and commercials for books, like this one for Douglas Clegg’s The Attraction:

Part of my enjoyment comes from the trailers themselves, part from the little thrill of seeing books elevated, however briefly, to the status of films, TV programs and laundry detergent. When you see one of these little gems, or flip on the TV and catch a commercial for the latest paperback bestseller, it almost makes you feel that reading has once again become a mainstream activity. Sure, it may be just an illusion, but it’s fun while it lasts.

While you can find lots of book trailers on sites like YouTube, and scattered around other places on the Web, I wish someone would create a central repository. There are dozens, if not hundreds, of places to find movie trailers, sites like this one and this one and even this one. But I’ve never seen anything similar for clips and commercials and trailers based on books. Is there one? Have I missed it? If you know of something, please let me know.

Oh, and if the Doug Clegg trailer caught your interest, be sure to check out the book itself. Also, you can find more information about Doug and his work, sign up for his newsletter, and find free goodies and other fun stuff at his very cool Web site.